Graph Neural Networks for Reliability Prediction in Smart City Infrastructure Systems

Authors

  • Christopher Atticus Computer Science Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, United States
  • Valentino Peyton Computer Science Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, United States
  • Maximilia Maximilia Computer Science Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, United States

Keywords:

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), Smart City Infrastructure, Reliability Prediction, Spatiotemporal Modeling, Predictive Maintenance

Abstract

 

Smart city infrastructures such as transportation networks, energy grids, and water distribution systems are increasingly equipped with heterogeneous sensors that generate large-scale, interconnected data. However, predicting infrastructure reliability remains challenging due to the complex spatial and temporal dependencies within these networks. This research proposes a Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based framework designed to model urban infrastructure as a graph consisting of nodes (e.g., intersections, substations, sensors) and edges (e.g., roads, pipelines, power lines), each enriched with multimodal operational features. By leveraging message-passing mechanisms and spatiotemporal GNN architectures, the model effectively learns relational patterns and evolving system dynamics to predict node and edge failure risks. Experimental results show that the proposed GNN significantly outperforms traditional machine-learning models, time-series approaches, and standard neural networks, achieving higher accuracy, lower error rates, and stronger generalization across infrastructure domains. Visual analyses including graph heatmaps, spatial propagation patterns, and critical node detection demonstrate the model’s ability to identify vulnerability clusters and potential cascading failures. The learned graph embeddings provide interpretable insights into system behavior, highlighting key risk factors and influential structural components. The findings suggest major real-world implications, including improved early warning systems, smarter maintenance scheduling, and substantial cost savings for urban management. While the framework’s performance depends on sensor data quality and computational resources, the study highlights the strong potential of graph-based learning to support more resilient, proactive, and data-driven smart city infrastructure management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. Soomro, M. N. M. Bhutta, Z. Khan, and M. A. Tahir, “Smart city big data analytics: An advanced review,” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 9, no. 5, p. e1319, 2019.

O. Vermesan and P. Friess, Internet of things: converging technologies for smart environments and integrated ecosystems. River publishers, 2013.

M.-O. Löwner, “3D topological relationships of landforms and their spatial schema-based representation,” Geo-spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 238–246, 2013.

Z. Wu, S. Pan, F. Chen, G. Long, C. Zhang, and P. S. Yu, “A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks,” IEEE Trans. neural networks Learn. Syst., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 4–24, 2020.

S. Stephenson, “Automotive applications of high precision GNSS.” University of Nottingham, 2016.

Y. Zhang, X. Dong, L. Shang, D. Zhang, and D. Wang, “A multi-modal graph neural network approach to traffic risk forecasting in smart urban sensing,” in 2020 17th Annual IEEE international conference on sensing, communication, and networking (SECON), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–9.

S. Ali, S. Bin Qaisar, H. Saeed, M. Farhan Khan, M. Naeem, and A. Anpalagan, “Network challenges for cyber physical systems with tiny wireless devices: A case study on reliable pipeline condition monitoring,” Sensors, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 7172–7205, 2015.

S. M. Kazemi et al., “Representation learning for dynamic graphs: A survey,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 21, no. 70, pp. 1–73, 2020.

X. Wang et al., “Heterogeneous graph attention network,” in The world wide web conference, 2019, pp. 2022–2032.

R. Guo et al., “BikeNet: Accurate bike demand prediction using graph neural networks for station rebalancing,” in 2019 IEEE smartworld, ubiquitous intelligence & computing, advanced & trusted computing, scalable computing & communications, cloud & big data computing, internet of people and smart city innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI), IEEE, 2019, pp. 686–693.

G. Chen, P. Chen, Y. Shi, C.-Y. Hsieh, B. Liao, and S. Zhang, “Rethinking the usage of batch normalization and dropout in the training of deep neural networks,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1905.05928, 2019.

M. Z. Naser and A. Alavi, “Insights into performance fitness and error metrics for machine learning,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2006.00887, 2020.

Z. Lv, B. Hu, and H. Lv, “Infrastructure monitoring and operation for smart cities based on IoT system,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1957–1962, 2019.

S. Raschka, “Model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection in machine learning,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1811.12808, 2018.

G. H. Nguyen, A. Bouzerdoum, and S. L. Phung, “Learning pattern classification tasks with imbalanced data sets,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 10, no. 2009, pp. 1322–1328, 2009.

A. Vyas and S. Bandyopadhyay, “Dynamic structure learning through graph neural network for forecasting soil moisture in precision agriculture,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2012.03506, 2020.

J. Wu, X.-Y. Chen, H. Zhang, L.-D. Xiong, H. Lei, and S.-H. Deng, “Hyperparameter optimization for machine learning models based on Bayesian optimization,” J. Electron. Sci. Technol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 26–40, 2019.

R. Meyes, M. Lu, C. W. De Puiseau, and T. Meisen, “Ablation studies in artificial neural networks,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1901.08644, 2019.

M. K. Islam, S. Aridhi, and M. Smail-Tabbone, “A comparative study of similarity-based and GNN-based link prediction approaches,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2008.08879, 2020.

S. Pundir, M. Wazid, D. P. Singh, A. K. Das, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, and Y. Park, “Intrusion detection protocols in wireless sensor networks integrated to Internet of Things deployment: Survey and future challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 3343–3363, 2019.

M. Skublewska-Paszkowska, P. Powroznik, and E. Lukasik, “Learning three dimensional tennis shots using graph convolutional networks,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 21, p. 6094, 2020.

X. Fan et al., “Deep learning for intelligent traffic sensing and prediction: recent advances and future challenges,” CCF Trans. Pervasive Comput. Interact., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 240–260, 2020.

R. D. Doverspike, “Carrier Network Architectures and Resiliency,” in Springer Handbook of Optical Networks, Springer, 2020, pp. 399–446.

A. Aral and I. Brandi?, “Learning spatiotemporal failure dependencies for resilient edge computing services,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1578–1590, 2020.

G. Pescaroli, R. T. Wicks, G. Giacomello, and D. E. Alexander, “Increasing resilience to cascading events: The M. OR. D. OR. scenario,” Saf. Sci., vol. 110, pp. 131–140, 2018.

M. Amin, “Toward secure and resilient interdependent infrastructures,” J. Infrastruct. Syst., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 67–75, 2002.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Atticus, C., Peyton, V., & Maximilia, M. (2024). Graph Neural Networks for Reliability Prediction in Smart City Infrastructure Systems. Jurnal Teknik Informatika C.I.T Medicom, 16(4), 242–253. Retrieved from https://www.medikom.iocspublisher.org/index.php/JTI/article/view/1355