A Probabilistic Decision Model for AI-Driven Optimization in Highly Complex Stochastic Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming (MINLP) Systems
Keywords:
Probabilistic Decision Model, AI-Driven Optimization, Stochastic MINLP, Robustness Under Uncertainty, Computational EfficiencyAbstract
Highly complex systems present significant challenges for optimization, particularly when operating under uncertainty, high dimensionality, and dynamic environmental conditions. This study proposes a probabilistic decision model designed to enhance AI-driven optimization by integrating uncertainty quantification, adaptive decision mechanisms, and robust probabilistic reasoning. The methodology combines probabilistic modeling with machine learning techniques and is evaluated through a series of controlled experimental scenarios that simulate real-world complexity and noise. The results indicate substantial improvements in decision accuracy, solution stability, and robustness compared to traditional deterministic and heuristic-based optimization methods. The model consistently maintains high performance despite uncertain inputs and fluctuating system parameters, demonstrating its reliability in environments where conventional approaches tend to degrade. Theoretical analysis further validates the model’s feasibility and guarantees performance consistency under uncertainty. Overall, this research contributes a scalable and resilient decision-making framework capable of addressing the limitations of existing optimization models, offering significant potential for broad application in AI-driven complex systems.
Downloads
References
R. Vecchiato, “Environmental uncertainty, foresight and strategic decision making: An integrated study,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 436–447, 2012.
D. R. Goda, S. R. Yerram, and S. R. Mallipeddi, “Stochastic optimization models for supply chain management: integrating uncertainty into decision-making processes,” Glob. Discl. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123–136, 2018.
J. Rudi et al., “An extreme-scale implicit solver for complex PDEs: Highly heterogeneous flow in earth’s mantle,” in Proceedings of the international conference for high performance computing, networking, storage and analysis, 2015, pp. 1–12.
Y. Park and G. O. Rogers, “Neighborhood planning theory, guidelines, and research: Can area, population, and boundary guide conceptual framing?,” J. Plan. Lit., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 18–36, 2015.
P. Belotti, C. Kirches, S. Leyffer, J. Linderoth, J. Luedtke, and A. Mahajan, “Mixed-integer nonlinear optimization,” Acta Numer., vol. 22, pp. 1–131, 2013.
D. Yue and F. You, “Planning and scheduling of flexible process networks under uncertainty with stochastic inventory: MINLP models and algorithm,” AIChE J., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1511–1532, 2013.
P. Hansen and N. Mladenovi?, “Variable neighborhood search: Principles and applications,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 449–467, 2001.
N. V Sahinidis, “Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities,” Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 28, no. 6–7, pp. 971–983, 2004.
R. James, S. Hesler, and J. Bistline, “Fossil fleet transition with fuel changes and large scale variable renewable integration,” Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA (United States), 2015.
N. R. Council et al., Assessing the reliability of complex models: mathematical and statistical foundations of verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification. National Academies Press, 2012.
N. Löhndorf, “An empirical analysis of scenario generation methods for stochastic optimization,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 255, no. 1, pp. 121–132, 2016.
R. D. Robinett III and D. G. Wilson, Nonlinear power flow control design: utilizing exergy, entropy, static and dynamic stability, and Lyapunov analysis. Springer, 2011.
J. Zhang and X. Wang, “A constraint solver and its application to path feasibility analysis,” Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng., vol. 11, no. 02, pp. 139–156, 2001.
Z. Sahli, A. Hamouda, A. Bekrar, and D. Trentesaux, “Reactive power dispatch optimization with voltage profile improvement using an efficient hybrid algorithm,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 2134, 2018.
B. H. Thacker, S. W. Doebling, F. M. Hemez, M. C. Anderson, J. E. Pepin, and E. A. Rodriguez, “Concepts of model verification and validation,” 2004.
L. Li, S. Song, C. Wu, and R. Wang, “Fix?and?Optimize and Variable Neighborhood Search Approaches for Stochastic Multi?Item Capacitated Lot?Sizing Problems,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2017, no. 1, p. 7209303, 2017.
A. Bemporad and S. Di Cairano, “Model-predictive control of discrete hybrid stochastic automata,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1307–1321, 2010.
M. Dan, S. Srinivasan, S. Sundaram, A. Easwaran, and L. Glielmo, “A scenario-based branch-and-bound approach for MES scheduling in urban buildings,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 7510–7520, 2020.
A. Díaz-Manríquez, G. Toscano, and C. A. Coello Coello, “Comparison of metamodeling techniques in evolutionary algorithms,” Soft Comput., vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 5647–5663, 2017.
M. Siddiqui, K. Al-Yateem, and A. Al-Thawadi, “A new tool to evaluate the feasibility of petroleum exploration projects using a combination of deterministic and probabilistic methods,” in SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, SPE, 2007, p. SPE-105694.
M. Sambridge, “Finding acceptable models in nonlinearinverse problems using a neighbourhood algorithm,” Inverse Probl., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 387, 2001.
R. Zhang, S. Song, and C. Wu, “Robust scheduling of hot rolling production by local search enhanced ant colony optimization algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2809–2819, 2019.
T. T. Georgiou and M. C. Smith, “Robustness analysis of nonlinear feedback systems: An input-output approach,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1200–1221, 2002.
S. Sengupta, S. Basak, and R. A. Peters, “Particle Swarm Optimization: A survey of historical and recent developments with hybridization perspectives,” Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 157–191, 2018.
J. H. Kämpf, M. Wetter, and D. Robinson, “A comparison of global optimization algorithms with standard benchmark functions and real-world applications using EnergyPlus,” J. Build. Perform. Simul., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103–120, 2010.
A. S. R. Subramanian, T. Gundersen, and T. A. Adams, “Modeling and simulation of energy systems: A review,” Processes, vol. 6, no. 12, p. 238, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hengki Tamando Sihotang, Roma Sinta Simbolon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
