A Unified Artificial Intelligence and Stochastic Optimization Framework for Decision-Making in Highly Complex Systems
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Stochastic Optimization, Decision-Making Under Uncertainty, Reinforcement Learning, Monte Carlo SimulationAbstract
Decision-making in highly complex systems is increasingly challenged by uncertainty, dynamic environments, and the availability of large-scale, high-dimensional data. Traditional optimization methods often lack adaptability, while standalone Artificial Intelligence models struggle to explicitly handle uncertainty in a principled manner. To address these limitations, this research proposes a unified framework that integrates Artificial Intelligence with Stochastic Optimization for enhanced decision-making in complex and uncertain environments. The proposed framework combines data-driven learning and probabilistic optimization within a closed-loop architecture consisting of data input, AI-based prediction, stochastic decision-making, and continuous feedback. Advanced AI models, including deep learning and reinforcement learning, are employed to extract patterns and generate predictive insights from real-time and historical data. These outputs are then incorporated into stochastic optimization models, which evaluate decisions under uncertainty using probabilistic constraints and scenario-based analysis. The framework is further strengthened by an adaptive feedback mechanism that continuously updates both learning and optimization components. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that the proposed approach outperforms traditional optimization and pure AI models in terms of decision accuracy, robustness under uncertainty, and adaptability to dynamic environments. The framework also shows improved stability and computational efficiency when applied to large-scale systems. Practical applications in domains such as finance, logistics, and smart city management highlight its real-world relevance. Overall, this research contributes to decision science by bridging the gap between learning and uncertainty modeling, providing a scalable and integrated solution for intelligent decision-making in highly complex systems.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, Z., Mohamed, K., Zeeshan, S., & Dong, X. (2020). Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine. Database, 2020, baaa010.
Akanbi, A., & Masinde, M. (2020). A distributed stream processing middleware framework for real-time analysis of heterogeneous data on big data platform: Case of environmental monitoring. Sensors, 20(11), 3166.
Al Janabi, M. A. M. (2021). Multivariate portfolio optimization under illiquid market prospects: a review of theoretical algorithms and practical techniques for liquidity risk management. Journal of Modelling in Management, 16(1), 288–309.
Alwan, M. S., & Liu, X. (2018). Theory of hybrid systems: deterministic and stochastic. Springer.
Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A., Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Tsarchopoulos, P., & Panori, A. (2018). Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(2), 146–169.
Benardos, P. G., & Vosniakos, G.-C. (2007). Optimizing feedforward artificial neural network architecture. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20(3), 365–382.
Bertsimas, D., & Thiele, A. (2006). Robust and data-driven optimization: modern decision making under uncertainty. In Models, methods, and applications for innovative decision making (pp. 95–122). INFORMS.
Booty, W. G., Lam, D. C.-L., Wong, I. W. S., & Siconolfi, P. (2001). Design and implementation of an environmental decision support system. Environmental Modelling & Software, 16(5), 453–458.
Boppiniti, S. T. (2020). Big data meets machine learning: Strategies for efficient data processing and analysis in large datasets. International Journal of Creative Research In Computer Technology and Design, 2(2).
Endres, H., Endres, M., & Berg, N. (2018). Adaptability Through dynamic capabilities. Springer.
Filip, F. G. (2008). Decision support and control for large-scale complex systems. Annual Reviews in Control, 32(1), 61–70.
Gouberman, A., & Siegle, M. (2012). Markov reward models and Markov decision processes in discrete and continuous time: Performance evaluation and optimization. In International Autumn School on Rigorous Dependability Analysis Using Model Checking Techniques for Stochastic Systems (pp. 156–241). Springer.
Grote, G. (2009). Management of uncertainty: Theory and application in the design of systems and organizations. Springer.
Gupta, V. (2019). Near-optimal Bayesian ambiguity sets for distributionally robust optimization. Management Science, 65(9), 4242–4260.
Hesse, F., Comunian, A., & Attinger, S. (2019). What we talk about when we talk about uncertainty. Toward a unified, data-driven framework for uncertainty characterization in hydrogeology. Frontiers in Earth Science, 7, 118.
Hipel, K. W., & Ben-Haim, Y. (2002). Decision making in an uncertain world: Information-gap modeling in water resources management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 29(4), 506–517.
Joshi, A. P., & Patel, B. V. (2021). Data preprocessing: the techniques for preparing clean and quality data for data analytics process. Orient. J. Comput. Sci. Technol, 13(0203), 78–81.
Kabir, S., Yazdi, M., Aizpurua, J. I., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2018). Uncertainty-aware dynamic reliability analysis framework for complex systems. IEEE Access, 6, 29499–29515.
Kaehne, A. (2017). Integration as a scientific paradigm. Journal of Integrated Care, 25(4), 271–279.
Li, C., & Grossmann, I. E. (2021). A review of stochastic programming methods for optimization of process systems under uncertainty. Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, 2, 622241.
Littell, J. S., McKenzie, D., Kerns, B. K., Cushman, S., & Shaw, C. G. (2011). Managing uncertainty in climate?driven ecological models to inform adaptation to climate change. Ecosphere, 2(9), 1–19.
Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2021). A multidisciplinary survey and framework for design and evaluation of explainable AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 11(3–4), 1–45.
Müller, S. (2016). A progress review of entrepreneurship and regional development: what are the remaining gaps? European Planning Studies, 24(6), 1133–1158.
Rubinstein, R. Y., & Kroese, D. P. (2016). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. John Wiley & Sons.
Sarker, I. H. (2021). Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Computer Science, 2(3), 1–21.
Tripathi, B. K., & Kalra, P. K. (2010). High dimensional neural networks and applications. In Intelligent autonomous systems: foundations and applications (pp. 215–233). Springer.
Tsopra, R., Fernandez, X., Luchinat, C., Alberghina, L., Lehrach, H., Vanoni, M., Dreher, F., Sezerman, O. U., Cuggia, M., & de Tayrac, M. (2021). A framework for validating AI in precision medicine: considerations from the European ITFoC consortium. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 274.
Wang, M., Fu, W., He, X., Hao, S., & Wu, X. (2020). A survey on large-scale machine learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34(6), 2574–2594.
Weaver, C. P., Lempert, R. J., Brown, C., Hall, J. A., Revell, D., & Sarewitz, D. (2013). Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: the value and demands of robust decision frameworks. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(1), 39–60.
Youn, B. D., & Choi, K. K. (2004). Selecting probabilistic approaches for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA Journal, 42(1), 124–131.
Zhang, J. (2021). Modern Monte Carlo methods for efficient uncertainty quantification and propagation: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 13(5), e1539.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hengki Tamando Sihotang, Galih Prakoso Rizky A
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
